题目信息
The author cites the fact that the Rio Grande pueblos were never formally withdrawn from public lands primarily in order to do which of the following?
A:Suggest why it might have been argued that the Winters doctrine ought not to apply to pueblo lands
B:Imply that the United States never really acquired sovereignty over pueblo lands
C:Argue that the pueblo lands ought still to be considered part of federal public lands
D:Support the argument that the water rights of citizens other than American Indians are limited by the Winters doctrine
E:Suggest that federal courts cannot claim jurisdiction over cases disputing the traditional diversion and use of water by Pueblo Indians
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
正确答案: A:Suggest why it might have been argued that the Winters doctrine ought not to apply to pueblo lands
权威答案解析正在整理中,即将上线。
笔记

登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
课程推荐
备考攻略
Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

网站维护公告

因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
趴趴GMAT
2019.10.14
确认