题目信息
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.

Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
A:Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
B:Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
C:Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
D:Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
E:States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
正确答案: D:Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
223.答案D
题目类型:增强题
题目大意:在美国,与汽车事故有关的乘客伤害通常比在欧洲法律要求不同类型安全带的欧洲更为严重。 显然,美国需要对安全带设计采用更严格的标准,以更好地保护汽车乘客。
题目逻辑:需注意本题目选择的是除削弱外的选项,也就是支持该论述的。
A.提出欧洲人更容易系安全带,引出题目未考虑的因素,削弱,非支持,错误。
B.提出训练的问题,引出题目未考虑的因素,削弱,非支持,错误。
C.提出汽车的问题,引出题目未考虑的因素,削弱,非支持,错误。
D.正确。
说明安全带不是核心问题,错误。
笔记

登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
课程推荐
备考攻略
Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

网站维护公告

因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
趴趴GMAT
2019.10.14
确认