题目信息
Kayla: Many people are reluctant to shop in our neighborhood because street parking is scarce. The city plans to address this by adding parking meters with time limits that ensure that parking spaces are generally available. But this plan will surely backfire—shoppers dislike paying at parking meters, so most will probably drive to other neighborhoods to shop at malls with free parking.

Which of the following, if true, would be the most logically effective rebuttal a proponent of the city's plan could make to Kayla's objection?
A:Most shoppers dislike hunting for scarce street parking spaces much more than they dislike paying for metered parking spaces.
B:The city could post signs with street parking time limits to ensure that parking spaces become available without forcing shoppers to pay at meters.
C:Currently, most shoppers in the neighborhood drive only occasionally to shop at malls in other neighborhoods.
D:The neighborhood already contains a parking lot where shoppers must pay to park.
E:The nearby malls with free parking have no parking time limits to help ensure that parking spaces in their lots become available.
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
正确答案: A:Most shoppers dislike hunting for scarce street parking spaces much more than they dislike paying for metered parking spaces.
答案A
题目类型:削弱反驳题
题目大意:凯拉(Kayla):由于路边停车位稀缺,许多人不愿在我们附近购物。该市计划通过添加具有时间限制的停车收费表来解决此问题,以确保普遍提供停车位。但是这一计划肯定会适得其反,因为购物者不喜欢在停车收费表上付款,因此大多数人可能会开车去其他社区,在有免费停车位的购物中心购物。
核心逻辑:需要选择出选项,来反驳人们会因为车位收费,前往其他社区购物的观点。
A.大多数购物者相比于寻找稀缺的车位,更愿意为收费的停车位付费。因为购物者对找车位和为车位付钱的讨厌程度不同,所以题目的观点有可能不成立,本题正确。
B.这个选项有一定道理,但是没有为凯拉的观点提供反驳。
C.描述的是目前的情况,安装车位后情况可能改变。
D.只说了社区已经有一个停车场,没有其他信息,我们无法进一步判断。
附近有免费停车场的购物中心没有停车时间限制,这不能为凯拉的观点提供反驳,甚至可以在某中程度上支持凯拉的观点。
笔记

登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
课程推荐
备考攻略
Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

网站维护公告

因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
趴趴GMAT
2019.10.14
确认