题目信息
Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?
According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth. This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth. This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.
A:those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
B:even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
C:many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
D:after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
E:even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等； 如有疑问，欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
本题耗时：
已选答案：
正确答案：
A:those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
题目要削弱fact，解释为什么fact不能反驳前文结论。直接找理由削弱就可以
A：正确，教育和job training多的国家，（不产生污染）本来环保压力就不大，即使有严格的政策也不会影响经济。但是对于依赖工业的别的国家，严格的环保政策的效果应该更显著。所以不能反驳前文观点。
B 环境保护更严厉的国家比不严厉的国际经济增长快，明显是在支持不是在反驳。C 很多遭受了经济衰退的国家正在考虑削弱环保规制，讲的是经济衰退的国家要干什么，没说削弱环保规制后的效果是增长经济还是什么，无关项。
D明显在支持，方向不对。
E基本没有环保规定的国家也有经济增长，跟要反驳的那句话完全不沾边。
加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
GWD
