Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do. Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?
推理模式:方案推理 问削弱
目标:reduce the risk of accidents
方案:bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job
找选项:抓住方案,所提到的内容与方案有关
A: 一些公司会把drinking problem的员工放到适合的deparment并允许其请病假(涉及方案,支持方向)
B:很多accident是工人粗壮造成的(不涉及方案)
C 正确。选项削弱解决方案,工人会把自己的酗酒记录掩饰起来,导致无法分辨是否有酗酒的工人,所以问题得不到解决。
D:drinking problem形成的原因(不涉及方案)
E:很多accident是机器造成的(不涉及方案)