题目信息

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered. Some commentators have argued, correctly, that since there is presently no objective test for whiplash, spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified. These commentators are, however, wrong to draw the further conclusion that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious: clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.


In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A:The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion drawn to support the judgment reached by the argument on the accuracy of that finding.
B:The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is evidence that has been used to challenge the accuracy of that finding.
C:The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes.
D:The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a narrower claim that the argument accepts.
E:The first is a claim that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument accepts; the second is that conclusion.
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
正确答案: C:The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion that has been used to support a conclusion that the argument criticizes.

commentators提出了两点看法:1.spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.——这个结论作者认为是正确的。2.in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious——这个结论作者认为是错误的。 其中commentators是先得出了第一个结论,然后又继续推论,得出第二个结论,所以第一个结论相对于第二个是intermediate conclusion, 第二个结论是commentator的最终conclusion,然而这个结论作者认为是错的,符合答案C

笔记

登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
GWD
Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
课程推荐
备考攻略
Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

网站维护公告

因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
趴趴GMAT
2019.10.14
确认