题目信息

Vorland's government is planning a nationwide ban on smoking in restaurants. The objection that the ban would reduce restaurants' revenues is ill founded. Several towns in Vorland enacted restaurant smoking restrictions five years ago. Since then, the amount the government collects in restaurant meal taxes in those towns has increased 34 percent, on average, but only 26 percent elsewhere in Vorland. The amount collected in restaurant meal taxes closely reflects restaurants' revenues.


Which of the following, if true, most undermines the defense of the government's plan?

A:When the state first imposed a restaurant meal tax, opponents predicted that restaurants' revenues would decline as a result, a prediction that proved to be correct in the short term.
B:The tax on meals in restaurants is higher than the tax on many other goods and services.
C:Over the last five years, smoking has steadily declined throughout Vorland.
D:In many of the towns that restrict smoking in restaurants, restaurants can maintain separate dining areas where smoking is permitted.
E:Over the last five years, government revenues from sales taxes have grown no faster in the towns with restaurant smoking restrictions than in the towns that have no such restrictions.
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
正确答案: D:In many of the towns that restrict smoking in restaurants, restaurants can maintain separate dining areas where smoking is permitted.

前提1:V政府计划全国参观戒烟

  2:已经戒烟5年的参观税收反而比没有戒烟的餐馆税高,税的总量直接反映了餐馆的效益

结论:反对者提出的戒严令会降低餐馆效益的说法是错的,也就是说戒烟令不会降低餐馆效益

削弱 有因无果,

A:支持者预测餐馆效益会短期下降 无关

B:餐饮税比其他税高 无关

C: 过去5年,吸烟情况逐渐下降 无关

D:直接说餐厅将抽烟和不抽烟的分开,那样的话有没有戒严令不都一回事,所以尽管前提2存在,但是由于抽烟和不抽烟的是分开的。

E:过去5年政府在禁烟区的销售税和非禁烟区的差不多 那不就支持了结论 戒烟令不会降低餐馆效益

笔记

登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
GWD
Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
课程推荐
备考攻略
Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

网站维护公告

因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
趴趴GMAT
2019.10.14
确认