题目信息

The First Amendment prevents the government from violating a person's right to free speech. But it does not protect government employees from disciplinary action for all statements they make in the course of their official duties. However, laws should protect them in cases in which employees bring to light information that advances the public interest in honest government and the rule of law.


Which of the following would provide the best example for the argument above?

A:An employee of the Central Intelligence Agency reveals classified information to a foreign government.
B:A movie star loses popularity because a studio employee tells a magazine about the star's troubled personal life.
C:An energy company`s stock plunges after an employee publicizes its accounting records.
D:A prominent plastic surgeon loses her license after an employee sues her for malpractice after she operates on him.
E:A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
正确答案: E:A Congressional aide reveals cases of bribery in the House of Representatives.

大意是:美国宪法第一修正案保障了公民的自由言论不受政府的影响;但是政府工作人员在工作时发表的言论若涉及处分是不受保护的(比如在白宫发言人在发言的时候吧);但是法律应当保护他们,因为他们可能会为了公民对于廉政的希望着想而揭露一些信息。题目问举个例子,e说的就是一个国会助理揭发众议院行贿。

笔记

登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
Manhattan
Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
课程推荐
备考攻略
Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

网站维护公告

因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
趴趴GMAT
2019.10.14
确认