题目信息
On average, the number of speeding tickets issued in County X every year is three times greater than the number of speeding tickets issued in County Y during the same period. Therefore, the number of people who exceed the speed limit must be higher in County X than in County Y.
Which of the following describes a flaw in the reasoning above?
A:The argument fails to take into account that the speed limit may be different in the two counties.
B:The argument fails to take into account that the number of tickets issued in County X may reflect a lower proportion of drivers overall in that county.
C:The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket in a given year.
D:The argument fails to take into account that residents of County Y may be more law-abiding overall.
E:The argument fails to take into account that residents of County X may not be aware of the speed limit in that county.
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等； 如有疑问，欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
本题耗时：
已选答案：
正确答案：
C:The argument fails to take into account that a single driver can receive more than one ticket in a given year.
如果题目说，X比Y罚单多，那么X比Y的人驾驶水平更差，那么A可以攻击原文，因为标准不同。但本题结论，罚单多说明违规人数多，罚单就是根据违规开的，只要不是一个人反复违规，那么罚单数就是违规人数。
加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
Manhattan
