题目信息
Marijuana advocate: If marijuana were legalized in this state, the state could start assessing tax on the drug, increasing state revenues. Since sales would be legal, the criminal culture supporting the drug would vanish; as crimes ceased, the state would save money on fighting crime. Overall, the state has a tremendous amount to gain by making the drug legal.

Attorney General: Studies of legalizing previously illegal drugs in other countries suggests that criminals controlling the business will not be eager either to sacrifice their profits or to play by the rules. Moreover, diverting money from crime-fighting after such legalization gives those criminals more free rein.

The Attorney General uses which of the following techniques in responding to the marijuana advocate?
A:calling into question the validity of the evidence cited
B:pointing out that the conclusion doesn't follow properly from the premises
C:questioning the purported relationship between cause and effect
D:arguing that the same evidence could be used to prove an opposing conclusion
E:suggesting, by analogy, potential drawbacks that might outweigh the predicted advantages
参考答案及共享解析
共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
正确答案: E:suggesting, by analogy, potential drawbacks that might outweigh the predicted advantages
权威答案解析正在整理中,即将上线。
笔记

登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

加入收藏
在线答疑
题目来源
Magoosh
Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
课程推荐
备考攻略
Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

网站维护公告

因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
趴趴GMAT
2019.10.14
确认