Why firms adhere to or deviate from their strategic plans is poorly understood. However, theory andlimited research suggest that the process through which such plans emerge may play a part. In particular, top management decision-sharing -- consensus-oriented, team-based decision-making -- may increase the likelihood that firms will adhere to their plans, because those involved in the decision-making may be more committed to the chosen course of action, thereby increasing the likelihood that organizations will subsequently adhere to their plans.
However, the relationship between top management decision-sharing and adherence to plans may be affected by a firm's strategic mission (its fundamental approach to increasing sales revenue and market share, and generating cash flow and short-term profits). At one end of the strategic mission continuum, "build" strategies are pursued when a firm desires to increase its market share and is willing to sacrifice short-term profits to do so. At the other end, "harvest" strategies are used when a firm is willing to sacrifice market share for short-term profitability and cash-flow maximization. Research and theory suggest that top management decision-sharing may have a more positive relationship with adherence to plans among firms with harvest strategies than among firms with build strategies. In a study of strategic practices in several large firms, managers in harvest strategy scenarios were more able to adhere to their business plans. As one of the managers in the study explained it, this is partly because "typically all a manager has to do when implementing a harvest strategy is that which was done last year." Additionally, managers under harvest strategies mayhave fewer strategic options than do those under build strategies; it may therefore be easier to reach agreement on a particular course of action through decision-sharing, which will in turn tend to promote adherence to plans. Conversely, in a "build" strategy scenario, individual leadership, rather than decision-sharing, may promote adherence to plans. Build strategies - which typically require leaders with strong personal visions for a firm's future, rather than the negotiated compromise of the team-based decision - may be most closely adhered to when implemented in the context of a clear strategic vision of an individual leader, rather than through the practice of decision-sharing.
The passage cites all of the following as differences between firms using build strategies and firms using harvest strategies EXCEPT

定位到第二段 A,B可以从At one end of ...和At the other end,...这两个标志性语句中找到:这两句分别对这两种strategy进行了定义。 C, 可以定位到Additionally, managers under harvest strategies may have fewer strategic options than do those under build strategies; it may therefore be easier to reach agreement on a particular course of action through decision-sharing因此这个difference也可以确定。 D,这个其实很明显,但是因为在文中的形式和在题干中的表述不太一样:原文中的位置是在At the other end那一句的最后面:"harvest" strategies are used when a firm is willing to sacrifice market share for short-term profitability and cash-flow maximization E正确。选项的关键词decision-sharing 在原文里面多次出现,不好排除。但是可以从具体的内容去理解:Decision sharing是一个不管在哪个strategy下都可能会发生的一件事(过程),不过在Harvest 下,更容易达到一致意见并把计划执行下来;而在Build下,plan更是靠领导个人的而不是Decision sharing执行下来。文中并没有说会在哪个情况下被用得更多(are to likely employ)

