题目信息

Historians who study European women of the Renaissance try to measure "independence", "options", and other indicators of the degree to which the expression of women's individuality was either permitted or suppressed. Influenced by Western individualism, these historians define a peculiar form of personhood: an innately bounded unit, autonomous and standing apart from both nature and society. An anthropologist, however, would contend that a person can be conceived in ways other than as an "individual." In many societies a person's identity is not intrinsically unique and self-contained but instead is defined within a complex web of social relationships.


In her study of the fifteenth-century Florentine widow Alessandra Strozzi, a historian who specializes in European women of the Renaissance attributes individual intention and authorship of actions to her subject. This historian assumes that Alessandra had goals and interests different from those of her sons, yet much of the historian's own research reveals that Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons' interests, taking their goals as her own. Thus Alessandra conforms more closely to the anthropologist's notion that personal motivation is embedded in a social context. Indeed, one could argue that Alessandra did not distinguish her personhood from that of her sons. In Renaissance Europe the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed and did not necessarily coincide with the boundaries of the bodily self.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • It can be inferred that the author of the passage believes which of the following about the study of Alessandra Strozzi done by the historian mentioned in the second paragraph?

    A:Alessandra was atypical of her time and was therefore an inappropriate choice for the subject of the historian's research.
    B:In order to bolster her thesis, the historian adopted the anthropological perspective on personhood.
    C:The historian argues that the boundaries of the conceptual self were not always firm and closed in Renaissance Europe.
    D:In her study, the historian reverts to a traditional approach that is out of step with the work of other historians of Renaissance Europe.
    E:The interpretation of Alessandra's actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian's research.
    参考答案及共享解析
    共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
    正确答案: E:The interpretation of Alessandra's actions that the historian puts forward is not supported by much of the historian's research.
    第二段:historian是支持A是individual的表现,yet小转折,much of the historian’s own research 自己的research表明, Alessandra acted primarily as a champion of her sons’ interests, taking their goals as her own. 把儿子的goal看成自己的goal从侧面证明了A的表现其实是说明了人类学家的。
    E选项中,A的interpretation指代文中This historian支持A individual的想法没有被much of the historian’s own research。E是原文改写。正确
    
    笔记

    登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

    加入收藏
    在线答疑
    题目来源
    GWD
    Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
    课程推荐
    备考攻略
    Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

    网站维护公告

    因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
    请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
    趴趴GMAT
    2019.10.14
    确认