In recent years, Western business managers have been heeding the exhortations of business journalists and academics to move their companies toward long-term, collaborative ""strategic partnerships"" with their external business partners (e.g., suppliers). The experts' advice comes as a natural reaction to numerous studies conducted during the past decade that compared Japanese production and supply practices with those of the rest of the world. The link between the success of a certain well-known Japanese automaker and its effective management of its suppliers, for example, has led to an unquestioning belief within Western management circles in the value of strategic partnerships. Indeed, in the automobile sector all three United States manufacturers and most of their European competitors have launched programs to reduce their total number of suppliers and move toward having strategic partnerships with a few.
However, new research concerning supplier relationships in various industries demonstrates that the widespread assumption of Western managers and business consultants that Japanese firms manage their suppliers primarily through strategic partnerships is unjustified. Not only do Japanese firms appear to conduct a far smaller proportion of their business through strategic partnerships than is commonly believed, but they also make extensive use of ""market-exchange"" relationships, in which either party can turn to the marketplace and shift to different business partners at will, a practice usually associated with Western manufacturers."
The passage is primarily concerned with

文章类型:学术研究
文章套路:观点对比
文章介绍了 Frazier 和 Mosteller 认为医学研究的临床试验需要进行方式转变。后面的文章则解释了他们认为该如何转变,并且他们认为应该转变的理由
题目类型: Main Idea
选项解析:
A、文章提到医学研究的实践是为了展示 Frazier 和 Mosteller 认为应该转变临床方式的理由
B、不仅仅讨论了会提高成本的医学实验,还讨论了如何改进。
C、并不只是在评估现在医学实验实践的缺点
D、正确答案
E、 并不是说当代研究者的研究方式可能发生改变,而是 Frazier 和 Mosteller 提出了改进的方法

