The idea that equipping homes with electrical appliances and other "modern" household technologies would eliminate drudgery, save labor time, and increase leisure for women who were full-time home workers remained largely unchallenged until the women's movement of the 1970's spawned the groundbreaking and influential works of sociologist Joann Vanek and historian Ruth Cowan. Vanek analyzed 40 years of time- use surveys conducted by home economists to argue that electrical appliances and other modern household technologies reduced the effort required to perform specific tasks, but ownership of these appliances did not correlate with less time spent on housework by full-time home workers. In fact, time spent by these workers remained remarkably constant― at about 52 to 54 hours per week― from the 1920's to the 1960's, a period of significant change in household technology. In surveying two centuries of household technology in the United States, Cowan argued that the "industrialization" of the home often resulted in more work for full-time home workers because the use of such devices as coal stoves, water pumps, and vacuum cleaners tended to reduce the workload of married-women's helpers (husbands, sons, daughters, and servants) while promoting a more rigorous standard of housework. The full-time home worker's duties also shifted to include more household management, child care, and the post-Second World War phenomenon of being "Mom's taxi."
The passage is primarily concerned with

文章类型:学术研究
文章套路:观点对比
文章介绍了 Frazier 和 Mosteller 认为医学研究的临床试验需要进行方式转变。后面的文章则解释了他们认为该如何转变,并且他们认为应该转变的理由
题目类型: Main Idea
选项解析:
A、文章提到医学研究的实践是为了展示 Frazier 和 Mosteller 认为应该转变临床方式的理由
B、不仅仅讨论了会提高成本的医学实验,还讨论了如何改进。
C、并不只是在评估现在医学实验实践的缺点
D、正确答案
E、 并不是说当代研究者的研究方式可能发生改变,而是 Frazier 和 Mosteller 提出了改进的方法

