In mid-February 1917 a women's movement independent of political affiliation erupted in New York City, the stronghold of the Socialist party in the United states. Protesting against the high cost of living, thousands of women refused to buy chickens, fish, and vegetables. The boycott shut. down much of the City's foodstuffs marketing for two weeks, riveting public attention on the issue of food prices, which had increased partly as a result of increased exports of food to Europe that had been occurring since the outbreak of the First World War. By early 1917 the Socialist party had established itself as a major political presence in New York City. New York Socialists, whose customary spheres of struggle were electoral work and trade union organizing, seized the opportunity and quickly organized an extensive series of cost-of-living protests designed to direct the women's movement toward Socialist goals. Underneath the Socialists' brief commitment to cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. While some Socialists did view price protests as a direct step toward socialism, most Socialists ultimately sought to divert the cost-of-living movement into alternative channels of protest. Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through which to combat the high cost of living. For others, cost-of-living or organizing was valuable insofar as it led women into the struggle for suffrage, and similarly, the suffrage struggle was valuable insofar as it moved United States society one step closer to socialism.
Although New York's Socialists saw the cost-of-living issue as, at best ,secondary or tertiary to the real task at hand, the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. A shared experience of swiftly declining living standards caused by rising food prices drove these women to protest. Consumer organizing spoke directly to their daily lives and concerns; they saw cheaper food as a valuable end in itself. Food price protests were these women's way of organizing at their own workplace, as workers whose occupation was shopping and preparing food for their families.
Which of the following best states the function of the passage as a whole?

A 选项是说, 对比社会党和抵制妇女在生活成本问题上的不同观点。
错,文中提到,社会党借壳这次妇女问题来实现他们自己的目的。但是首段和末端都是在讨论抵制问题。所以全文的重点还是回到生活成本问题上来
B选项是说, 分析了社会党持有的反对观点的假设。。全文重点不在社会党。社会党只是穿插了其中。
C选项说, 提供了解决生活成本的不同办法的历史观点。
正确。全文的重点还是生活成本问题, 然后提到, 最初是妇女自发的,然后社会党参与其中,不过社会党是另有所图,最后回到重点说, 抵制的妇女最终在意的还是生活成本。
D 选项是说, 纽约社会党作为一股政治势力出现的事件的时间顺序。 错,全文重点不在社会党
E 选项是说, 分析社会党参与妇女选举权运动的动因, 严重跑题了。

