(The following was excerpted from material written in 1988.)
For over a decade the most common policy advice given to developing countries by international development institutions has been to copy the export-oriented path of the newly industrializing countries, the celebrated NIC's. These economies-Brazil, Hong Kong, Mexico, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan-burst into the world manufacturing market in the late 1960's and the 1970's; by 1978 these six economies, along with India, enjoyed unequaled growth rates for gross national product and for exports, with exports accounting for 70 percent of the developing world's manufactured exports. It was, therefore, not surprising that dozens of other countries attempted to follow their model, yet no countries-with the possible exceptions of Malaysia and Thailand-have even approached their success. In "No More NIC's," Robin Broad and John Cavanagh search for the reasons behind these failures, identifying far-reaching changes in the global economy-from synthetic substitutes for commodity exports to unsustainable levels of foreign debt-as responsible for a glut economy offering little room for new entrants. Despite these changes, the authors maintain, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund-the foremost international development institutions-have continued to promote the NIC path as the way for heavily indebted developing countries to proceed. And yet the futility of this approach should, according to the authors, be all too apparent so many years into a period of reduced growth in world markets.
The author mentions Malaysia and Thailand in order to

根据Malaysia和Thailand这个关键词定位到原文发现这两个地方是dozens of other countries的exception,原文的意思是其他国家都没有成功,只有例外的这两个国家成功了 A.承认大范围里的不可能,与原文的意思相反,原文是说大多数国家行不通只有两个国家成功 B.承认概括中的反例,generalization是dozens of countries failed,counter-examples是Malaysis和Thailand C.这里的反例,并非为I个结论提供support evidence D.这里特别提到反例,而不是说明broad application E.限制分析范文,文章没有对范围(即国家)进行任何限制

