题目信息

The fall of the Berlin Wall represented a political victory of the free market against a centrally planned economy. Though highly interventionist and dependent on international defense and industrial subsidy, West Germany was a model of economic expansion in the post-war era. East Germany, while relatively successful in comparison with other Eastern Bloc nations, was far behind West Germany with regard to the buying power of its people. It was hard to avoid obvious comparisons such as the fact that 1 in 4 East Germans did not even have an indoor toilet. Western German authorities were therefore committed to rapid integration of the two Germanys without resorting to massive controls on internal migration, external capital controls, or continuation of a large state-owned industrial sector.


Other nations were already wary of a united Germany. France, a perpetual competitor, saw Germany's size advantage increase overnight. In Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") alone, an historical size advantage of 23% jumped to nearly 30%, with stronger growth promised when East Germany was fully integrated.


Within Germany, there should have been no doubt that integration would be costly. The question was whether the government was up to the task. In Italy, for example, the central government has invested tremendous resources in promoting the economy of its under-performing Southern region. In contrast, in the United States, the local population bears the burden of varying economic performance. For example, the American South is allowed to exist with much higher rates of poverty and lower education than the rest of the nation.


Rather than allow East Germany to fall into total disrepair, with millions fleeing to the West and a long-term negative impact on national GDP growth, West German authorities decided to try to spend their way out of the crisis, creating almost overnight an infrastructure in East Germany to provide a standard of living comparable to that in West Germany. The goal was to take an under-performing country and raise it to "first world" standards in only a few years. This goal would have been preposterous had not West Germany possessed the resources to accomplish the task.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • The author mentions the United States most probably in order to

    A:argue against a commonly held belief about market economies
    B:provide an example of a situation seen as undesirable
    C:suggest an advantageous solution to an economic problem
    D:illustrate an economic principle called into question
    E:demonstrate the positive consequences of economic freedom
    参考答案及共享解析
    共享解析来源为网络权威资源、GMAT高分考生等; 如有疑问,欢迎在评论区提问与讨论
    正确答案: B:provide an example of a situation seen as undesirable

    前面说毫无疑问在德国是costly,然后话锋一转,说关键是看政府有没有履行职责,Italy有,但是美国相反,完全大众受了苦

    笔记

    登录后可添加笔记, / 注册

    加入收藏
    在线答疑
    题目来源
    Manhattan
    Hi,欢迎来到PAPA GMAT!
    课程推荐
    备考攻略
    Copyright © 2015-2023 上海彼伴网络科技有限公司 沪ICP备2023023608号-2

    网站维护公告

    因版权方要求,我站部分题库资源将暂停访问,由此给大家带来的不便我们深表歉意。具体恢复时间将另行通知。
    请关注趴趴GMAT公众号【趴趴GMAT商科留学】获取最新资讯和其他备考干货;免费集训营和权威公开课亦将循环开设,欢迎各位同学积极报名参加,感谢各位同学的理解和支持。
    趴趴GMAT
    2019.10.14
    确认