The term "episodic memory" was introduced by Tulving to refer to what he considered a uniquely human capacity-the ability to recollect specific past events, to travel back into the past in one's own mind-as distinct from the capacity simply to use information acquired through past experiences. Subsequently, Clayton et al. developed criteria to test for episodic memory in animals. According to these criteria, episodic memories are not of individual bits of information; they involve multiple components of a single event "bound" together. Clayton sought to examine evidence of scrub jays' accurate memory of "what," "where," and "when" information and their binding of this information. In the wild, these birds store food for retrieval later during periods of food scarcity. Clayton's experiment required jays to remember the type, location, and freshness of stored food based on a unique learning event. Crickets were stored in one location and peanuts in another. Jays prefer crickets, but crickets degrade more quickly. Clayton's birds switched their preference from crickets to peanuts once the food had been stored for a certain length of time, showing that they retain information about the what, the where, and the when. Such experiments cannot, however, reveal whether the birds were reexperiencing the past when retrieving the information. Clayton acknowledged this by using the term "episodic-like" memory.
It can be inferred from the passage that both Tulving and Clayton would agree with which of the following statements?

a动物的某种能力不是关键的证据。本文的实验结果是证明动物可以binding information,但是还是不确定它们是不是具有episodic memory。也就是从实验结果无法证实episodic memory的存在。所以A是正确的,即动物运用information的能力不能作为一个结论性的证据来证明episodic memory,正确
b动物不具有人类的这种特性,原文用的是whether,所以是还不太确定,这个选项太绝对
c很难用实验去确定,不对
d人类比动物recollect得更好,不对
e捆绑信息不是episodic memory的特殊点,不对

